Research Reviews – 2017 Spring

What: This seminar is designed to facilitate critical discussion of research projects at various stages of their development. Each term I hope to attract ~8-12 participants with various backgrounds who are interested in helping colleagues work through problems they have encountered in their research (such as the formulation of hypotheses, synthesis of existing research, design of experiments, analysis of experimental and comparative data, interpretation of complex data).
Format: We will meet for 2 hours at my home during one evening for 12 or so weeks of the semester.  During the first 20-30 minutes of each evening, the lead discussant will introduce a problem.  The introduction should include: a) 5-10 minutes during which they lay out the conceptual framework for their research (this should emphasize general ideas, concepts, theory; it should not involve reference to the specific study system); b) 10-15 minutes during which they provide the necessary detail about the study study and background data.  This orientation should be specific and focused - it will establish the foundation and focus for the evening's discussion.  c) The presentation should end with specific statement about the evening's goals: what problems do you want the group to help resolve?  The remaining 1.5 hours will be spent in lively and critical discussion with the primary purpose of improving the discussion leader's research program, and indirectly helping all of us improve our own research by further developing our abilities to (i) ask compelling ecological and evolutionary questions, (ii) apply appropriate tools to resolve those questions; (iii) detect flaws in methodology, approaches and inference, and (iv) suggest insightful solutions to these problems (i.e., propose alternative methods, approaches, and interpretations).  Short readings might be assigned to provide background and/or to facilitate discussion, but I mostly anticipate detailed discussions focused on the student’s research: i.e., participants should not have to "prepare" (but I expect the discussion leader to do considerable preparation).
Who: Graduate students, faculty, post-docs, as well as advanced undergraduates with research experience. Because feedback at all stages in a research project is critical to its success, I hope to have a cross-section of students at all stages in their graduate training.  Because diverse feedback from people with different perspectives also is critical, I hope to attract students from a wide range of labs and interests.  [Although this format is much like a "lab meeting", it is designed to provide a broader base of critical feedback and to include more novel perspectives than you might get from a smaller group of "like-minded" peers.]  I welcome students from any department on campus with  interests in ecology, environmental science, comparative biology, or evolutionary biology.
When and Where: Thursday evenings (time: 530-730pm) at my home. 


Discussion Leader

Jan 05

Elizabeth Hamman

January 12

Rachel Smith

January 19

Amy Briggs

January 26

No class (GSS)

February 02

Ceclia Sanchez

February 09

No class (Craig at GoMRI)

February 16

Daniel Becker

February 23

Anya Brown

March 02

Rebecca Atkins

March 09

No class (spring break)

March 16

No class (Craig at PhD defense at UF)

March 23

David Vasquez

March 30

Claire Teitelbaum

April 06

Ashton Griffin

April 13

No class (Benthic Ecology meetings)

April 20

Jeff Beauvais

April 25 (Tuesday; 630pm)

Carly Phillips

& Potluck