Research Reviews – 2016 Spring

What: This seminar is designed to facilitate critical discussion of research projects at various stages of their development. Each term I hope to attract ~8-12 participants with various backgrounds who are interested in helping colleagues work through problems they have encountered in their research (such as the formulation of hypotheses, synthesis of existing research, design of experiments, analysis of experimental and comparative data, interpretation of complex data).
Format: We will meet for 2 hours at my home during one evening for 10 or so weeks of the semester.  During the first 20-30 minutes of each evening, the lead discussant will introduce a problem.  The introduction should include: a) 5-10 minutes during which they lay out the conceptual framework for their research (this should emphasize general ideas, concepts, theory; it should not involve reference to the specific study system); b) 10-15 minutes during which they provide the necessary detail about the study study and background data.  This orientation should be specific and focused - it will establish the foundation and focus for the evening's discussion.  c) The presentation should end with specific statement about the evening's goals: what problems do you want the group to help resolve?  The remaining 1.5 hours will be spent in lively and critical discussion with the primary purpose of improving the discussion leader's research program, and indirectly helping all of us improve our own research by further developing our abilities to (i) ask compelling ecological and evolutionary questions, (ii) apply appropriate tools to resolve those questions; (iii) detect flaws in methodology, approaches and inference, and (iv) suggest insightful solutions to these problems (i.e., propose alternative methods, approaches, and interpretations).  Short readings might be assigned to provide background and/or to facilitate discussion, but I mostly anticipate detailed discussions focused on the student’s research: i.e., participants should not have to "prepare" (but I expect the discussion leader to do considerable preparation).
Who: Graduate students, faculty, post-docs, as well as advanced undergraduates with research experience. Because feedback at all stages in a research project is critical to its success, I hope to have a cross-section of students at all stages in their graduate training.  Because diverse feedback from people with different perspectives also is critical, I hope to attract students from a wide range of labs and interests.  [Although this format is much like a "lab meeting", it is designed to provide a broader base of critical feedback and to include more novel perspectives than you might get from a smaller group of "like-minded" peers.]  I welcome students from any department on campus with  interests in ecology, environmental science, comparative biology, or evolutionary biology.
When and Where: Wednesday evenings (730-930pm) at my home. 


Discussion Leader

Jan 13

Elizabeth Hamman

January 20

Daniel Becker

January 27

Chao Song

February 03

No class (Craig at GoMRI)

February 10

Rebecca Atkins

February 17

No class (job interviews)

February 24

No class (job interviews)

March 02

Maite Ghazaleh

March 09

No class (Spring Break)

March 16

Linsey Haram

March 23

Molly Fisher

March 30

Greg Jacobs

April 06

Rachel Smith

April 13

Robbie Richards

April 20

Amy Briggs

April 27


Other participants:  
Anya Brown
Courtney Murdock